Senses Truth

Senses fair playSensesYour senses atomic number 18 the inner being of our souls and that is what needs to be used first and foremost. Trust can be down in the mouth and emotions argon deceiving/ Our senses tell us when something is wrong and if we chose to ignore our senses and invest what someone is sex act us we can end up being hurt and if we go on emotions boy, children lounge just about hurt many times when they determine that grownup and devote that a bad person with a sob romance will tell them. NO we need to cuss our sensesTricky distrust FIRST, we sw allow to be tot every last(predicate)y AWARE of our senses what they make us sp justlylinessing like and what they mean. Emotions are quite a bit harder to truly examine. When a person IS totally aware of their senses, then it is all important(predicate) to trust them at all times. Emotions should be acted on only after you rattlingly under bide them, so trusting them automati discovery is non always wis e.The senses never fox us loyalty they bankrupt us data. Truth is non something we sense, it is something we recognize. Truth is a state of being. Accuracy of the data imparted by the senses is pretty safe, in time our interpretation of that data is many times in error. Emotion is the probosciss reaction to thought. We can trust the randomness that emotion imparts only as farther as we collapse been able to be enumerate aware of how it operates in our lives. exclusively emotion is giving us information about ourselves and is best dealt with sufferance for what it is. Knowing the real message of our emotions as opposed to just reacting with them is the monetary standard of how much one can trust his emotions.Most of the time, but not always. Because if youre hopped up on pills, well then your senses authentically wont be all that true.The question is askew. Rephrase, -when should we trust our senses in rooting out a lie-. Our senses work best in trying to prove if so mething violates our produce laidledge of reality, not if what we know is absolutely sure, but rather if a new impartiality violates known loyaltys, and the old ways remain the way. Previous experience with our senses let us know that something is fishy. We whitethorn not know the faithfulness per say, but we know crap on velcro when we smell it.When I feel theres something is wrong, theres a truth to it. When I fell I cant stand any to a greater extent then I should let go.Our greatest enemy is ourself including our senses. What we feel sometimes kills us or telling us what will puzzle ahead. We should know when to trust our senses and when not to.the truth is what we sense,different sense got different truth,but is is all embed on what we SENSE,and SENSING is the nature who know ITSELF,SO ALL IS TRUTH. so far ILLUSION IS THE TRUTH OF SOMETHING REALLY EXIST BEHIND THE SENSING.I potently believe in trusting ur instincts ur inner voice. But u should alike borrow into acc ount the evidence the clues around us.hey guys im going to do my ToK stress on When should we trust our senses to give us truth? (2)Some cerebrations ive got so far is formation truth . how sense perception is how we fix the human being and the way we interpret it might be flawed and so what we cod to be true could be false I cannot really fand so forth up with any examples of WHEN we should trust our senses to give us the truth because i dont really believe senses give us the truth ( except for when my milk is really hot or cold but again that is with admire to me, might be the opposite for anformer(a)) .. i stand for senses just gives us raw information tht we then military operation through our knowledge and come up with what we believe is true but is what we believe to be true really true? yeah am i heading in the right direction with this seek? any help appreciatedhey i am doing the same question yea i retrieve ur in d right direction..start by defining truth (thi s can get philosophical) and then the senses namely sight, smell, touch, hearing and taste. The functioning of all these senses together may give u sum truth (again, what is truth) but isnt truth based on our own perception? the best example for reasoning that i came up with is belief in god. we dont see him, hear him, feel him, etc. but we still believe in him. Now wat causes this? It is the faith and for us it becomes the ultimate truth. then wat if u hav a cold? can u still trust ur sense of smell?just emphasize on small everyday examples..it should b fine. Glad to help. Keep me posted if u hva any other ideasI think youre heading in the right direction For TOK screens I have found that you dont have to come up with an settle, you just have to debate the topic (because when is there ever an answer in philosophy?) Somehow, you should relate it back to knowledge. Research the philosopher A.J. Ayer and his concept of confirm true belief basically, for something to be known it ha s to be believed, justified (by the senses perhaps) and true. The hindrance is proving whether something is true (science, for example, never proves anything just supports it). Then, theres the whole spiral of how to test the true statement of your senses (or any other way of knowing) how do you then test the trueness of the method you use to test whether your senses were accurate, and then how do you test this method etc. There is another theory of knowledge known as justified reliablism where for a knowledge claim to be knowledge it has to be believed, true and justified according to a reliable cognitive process there is a lot of debate over what constitutes a reliable cognitive process and in picky about whether the senses are trustworthy enough to be this process. Its worth a research.The question calculates to be root in a similar question from last year atomic number 18 some ways of knowing more likely to lead to the truth than others? If you could get hold of some o f these tastes you would definitely get some idea of how to tackle this question (Just dont misuse them using same examples, etc.). If you ask nicely, I can email you my response to that very question.TruthI hav a question definin truth n al that is fine but isnt the topic suppose to be around when can v trust the senses..to giv us truthTrue, and that is what the essay should focus on, but at the beginning of your essay you need to countersink your terms. There is no point writing an essay that no-one understands. When I say define truth, I mean briefly take a paragraph or so and the beginning of your essay to define stuff (knowledge, truth, just some of the more abstract concepts that youll be dealings with)TRUTH is CREATED as part of a biological process. It can be understood in terms of DEVELOPMENT, ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, and PHYSIOLOGY.As we transfer information we swindle about the world (lets call it reality) into ourselves by means of whatever sensory abilities we can bri ng to bear, we are right to question and test our percxeptions to establish the asperity and reliability of our experiences and the beliefs they engender. Is there a difference between the real world (reality) and what we think we know about it (truth) We are all touch on about what is true and what is not with what is real. Do we always perceive what we think we do? How far can we trust our senses? (read Plato on this point) Scientists that look for the boundaries of what is known of the world are especially wary. They are often confronted with information for which there is little or no precedent to guide their popular opinion about the meaning of their data. For example, having an emotional investment in a particular outcome of an experiment is a notorious source of unconscious bias. The objectiveness of a researcher is highly admired as is their efforts to assure the validity and reliability of their data.Never, our senses are deceiving. There is no constant formula to ou r senses. It what makes it so hard for us to look on things clearly, to gain a sense of reality. We shall never be able to perceive something from other peoples viewpoints, ergo we shall never have a shared opinion. If anything, we can only rely on math and reason. It is the most universal thing we have.Your senses, sight, hearing etc always give you the truth, they are incapable of anything else. The problem is, how do you interpret the evidence. There are books on optical illusions but if you know its an illusion it easy to see the trickery. If you dont know its an illusion you can be fooled, so be cautious.its what you perceive as truth till you shown different..for example..when we ask mommie and daddy where do babies come from and you get the ole stork storyyou find out laterya know?1. When they corroborate with what we logically reason.2. Whenever they do not contradict themselves, or the past.3. Whenever you are sensible, alert, and at rest. As examples, being sot or high does not count as this.4. At all times. You can trust your senses They simply pick up what is around us5. Never. Do not trust your senses They are fooled far too considerablyAny time that truth can be independently corroborate by evidence, sound logic, science, etc.True of false exists only in our language. There is a commonly told joke of a man tearaway(a) on a two laned roadway. A beautiful woman drives past him going the other way in a convertible. As she goes by she leans out and yells, PIG. The man is visibly upset and starts thinking, Why did she call me a pig? I dont even know this woman. Maybe I met her and dont really remember her face? He continues driving as hes having these thoughts. As he rounds a bend in the road, he runs into a huge pig standing in the road. So all that happend was she yelled pig. There was goose egg true of false in what she did. But his interpretation of her actionthat she called him a pigwas not related to the reality of what happened. Even h ad he thought she was trying to deter him, that would only have been one possible interpretation and may not have been any more true than the interpretation the shes calling him a pig.when we are using our senses solely for the material sides of things, and we feel certain that we would have the agreement of most or all rational observers over what we sense.In a rational state of mind, a car seen approaching should be taken as a real event.find that strictly scientific people have problems straying from their scientific rigor in ToK. You moldiness find a way to diverge from this science thing and pen a balanced essay. Ill say what I always do in these ToK threads. Find something one end of the spectrum such as mathematics/Science and then find another AoK to contrast it with such as Art/Ethics etc. I dont believe we should ever trust our senses to give us truth. Why do you think we have created so much advanced machinery that can perceive what we cannot, to give us reliable knowle dge? Did your teacher not show you psychological illusions to show how appalling our perception and senses are? The bottom line is that we should rarely trust our senses to give us truth, but unfortunately they are all we haveOur senses are how we view the outside world. Without them, we would be hopeless. I then gave a some examples of animals trusting senses with their lives senses are used to understand the outside world, the world that is strange from our bodies. However, our senses can be deceived, like a magic trick. Also, there are some spectras of light that our human eye cannot see. So therefore, we cant trust our senses to give us ALL the info. Then I defined truth and linked it with the information that our senses gave. Then I stated that perhaps what we see may not be what we see after all, just what we call it. Hence, I am typing on a computer, or more accurately, I am communicating my ideas to you on a object I call a computer, whether it be it or not. The latter w ould be more true than the former. Quote Rene Descartes and describe the Matrix-effect. Then conclude. Cant remember what I got exactly, but I remember I did really well. Hope it helps.I think one big way of knowing to talk about in this title would be perception and the problems with perception, how perception are unverifiable/biased? and can be deceived. But as you said its important to focus on the WHEN of perception, not the WHETHER.Tok essays are about 4 thingsdefining the wordsarguing against what you thinkarguing for what you thinkconcluding that what you think is writewith a sprinkling of areas of knowledge throughout2bh ur question doesnt seem very TOKey, it doesnt lend itself to any specific area of knowledge.relate truth to truth in science and maths or 2 other areas of knowledge.for example in science we see salt dissappear when it goes into water, but if we dethaw off the water than the salt will still be there. what we observe is something dissaperaing but the truth (scientific truth) is that the salt dissolves due to etc etc scientific explanation.i submitted this essay yesterday.. it had the same question to answer..you just mention in the main body a bit about the argument between believing in senses or not with evidences and the say when we must trust them .. i wrote that we trust them when it seems logical for example when u put a pencil in a cup of water then observe the pencil broken because of refraction,, then in this case u dont believe in it because u can easily use another sense which is touch to check.. thats what i wrote i dont know if its right or not .. but cipher is wrong in TOK.. right..? think so just give alot of examples in ur essay.. hope ive helped..